Source code for genlayer.std.eq_principles

__all__ = (
	'eq_principle_strict_eq',
	'eq_principle_prompt_comparative',
	'eq_principle_prompt_non_comparative',
)

from ._internal.prompt_ids import *

import genlayer.std._wasi as wasi

import genlayer.std.advanced as advanced
import typing
import json
from ..py.types import *
from ._internal import (
	decode_sub_vm_result,
	decode_sub_vm_result_retn,
	lazy_from_fd,
	lazy_from_fd_no_check,
	_lazy_api,
)
from .nondet_fns import exec_prompt


[docs] @_lazy_api def eq_principle_strict_eq[T](fn: typing.Callable[[], T]) -> Lazy[T]: """ Comparative equivalence principle that checks for strict equality :param fn: functions to perform an action """ def validator_fn( leaders: advanced.ContractReturn | Rollback | advanced.ContractError, ) -> bool: my_res, leaders_res = advanced.validator_handle_rollbacks_and_errors_default( fn, leaders ) return my_res == leaders_res return advanced.run_nondet(fn, validator_fn)
[docs] @_lazy_api def eq_principle_prompt_comparative( fn: typing.Callable[[], typing.Any], principle: str ) -> Lazy[str]: """ Comparative equivalence principle that utilizes NLP for verifying that results are equivalent :param fn: function that does all the job :param principle: principle with which equivalence will be evaluated in the validator .. note:: As leader results are encoded as calldata, :py:func:`format` is used for string representation. However, operating on strings by yourself is more safe in general """ def validator_fn( leaders: advanced.ContractReturn | Rollback | advanced.ContractError, ) -> bool: my_res, leaders_res = advanced.validator_handle_rollbacks_and_errors_default( fn, leaders ) vars = { 'leader_answer': format(leaders_res), 'validator_answer': format(my_res), 'principle': principle, } return wasi.eq_principle_prompt(TemplateId.COMPARATIVE, json.dumps(vars)) return advanced.run_nondet(fn, validator_fn)
[docs] @_lazy_api def eq_principle_prompt_non_comparative( fn: typing.Callable[[], str], *, task: str, criteria: str ) -> Lazy[str]: """ Non-comparative equivalence principle that must cover most common use cases Both leader and validator finish their execution via NLP, that is used to perform ``task`` on ``input``. Leader just executes this task, but the validator checks if task was performed with integrity. This principle is useful when task is subjective """ def leader_fn() -> str: input_res = fn() assert isinstance(input_res, str) return lazy_from_fd( wasi.exec_prompt_id( TemplateId.NON_COMPARATIVE_LEADER, json.dumps( { 'task': task, 'input': input_res, 'criteria': criteria, } ), ), lambda buf: str(buf, 'utf-8'), ).get() def validator_fn( leaders: advanced.ContractReturn | Rollback | advanced.ContractError, ) -> bool: my_input, leaders_result = advanced.validator_handle_rollbacks_and_errors_default( fn, leaders ) vars = { 'task': task, 'output': leaders_result, 'input': my_input, 'criteria': criteria, } return wasi.eq_principle_prompt(TemplateId.NON_COMPARATIVE, json.dumps(vars)) return advanced.run_nondet(leader_fn, validator_fn)